{
 "culture": "en-US",
 "name": "",
 "guid": "",
 "catalogPath": "",
 "snippet": "Permeability / hydraulic conductivity. The permeability map that we chose\ncomes from a numerical ground-water flow model developed by Jorgensen and\nothers (1996). The rock matrix consists of low-porosity mudstones and\ndolomudstones. However, the permeability map of Jorgensen and others (1996) is\nregional in scope and does not reflect local differences in porosity and\npermeability. Therefore, one must realize that because of dissolution and\ndolomitization, the Arbuckle Group rocks are locally some of the most porous and\npermeable in the Mid-Continent region. It is often true that reported porosity and\npermeability values are much lower than the true values (Puckette, 1996).\nPuckette offered two examples of this phenomenon. The producing section of\nCottonwood Creek field, Carter County, Oklahoma, has produced more than\n4,000 bopd. Yet the reported porosity and permeability are 2 to 3 percent and less\nthan 0.01 millidarcy, respectively (after Read and Richmond, 1993). In large part\nthis is due to the nature of the karsted rock, which during coring yields\nproportionately much more of the low-porosity rock than the porous, sometimes\nbrecciated and cavernous zones (Puckette, 1996).",
 "description": "Permeability, permeability distritubtion \n\nPublication Date: 2012\n\nGeographic Extent: Oklahoma, Kansas, Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana",
 "summary": "Permeability / hydraulic conductivity. The permeability map that we chose\ncomes from a numerical ground-water flow model developed by Jorgensen and\nothers (1996). The rock matrix consists of low-porosity mudstones and\ndolomudstones. However, the permeability map of Jorgensen and others (1996) is\nregional in scope and does not reflect local differences in porosity and\npermeability. Therefore, one must realize that because of dissolution and\ndolomitization, the Arbuckle Group rocks are locally some of the most porous and\npermeable in the Mid-Continent region. It is often true that reported porosity and\npermeability values are much lower than the true values (Puckette, 1996).\nPuckette offered two examples of this phenomenon. The producing section of\nCottonwood Creek field, Carter County, Oklahoma, has produced more than\n4,000 bopd. Yet the reported porosity and permeability are 2 to 3 percent and less\nthan 0.01 millidarcy, respectively (after Read and Richmond, 1993). In large part\nthis is due to the nature of the karsted rock, which during coring yields\nproportionately much more of the low-porosity rock than the porous, sometimes\nbrecciated and cavernous zones (Puckette, 1996).",
 "title": "Arbuckle Group Permeability",
 "tags": [
  "United States",
  "Oklahoma",
  "Kansas",
  "Texas",
  "Arkansas",
  "Louisiana",
  "Arbuckle Formation Permeability",
  "Arbuckle Formation",
  "Formation Permeability",
  "Arbuckle",
  "Formation",
  "Permeability",
  "Polyline"
 ],
 "type": "",
 "typeKeywords": [],
 "thumbnail": "",
 "url": "",
 "minScale": 150000000,
 "maxScale": 5000,
 "spatialReference": "",
 "accessInformation": "Havorka, S., Romero, M., Warne, A., Ambrose, W., Tremblay, T., Trevino, R., and Sasson, D. \"Sequestration of Greenhouse Gassesin Brine Formations: CO2 Brine Database. Bureau of Economic Geology Gulf Coast Carbon Center. 2012. https://www.beg.utexas.edu/gccc/research/brine-main",
 "licenseInfo": "Public access"
}